Trying out photoblogging...

http://gaiussensei-photos.blogspot.com/
Check it out guys~ New blog! I'm kindof busy right now, but since I'll be out and about a few places this month, I'll be capturing quite a bit of photos. It'll be low resolution since I currently don't own a DSLR, but I'll make sure to post my best shots.

Photos taken using: HTC Wildfire and the Vignette Camera App. ^^ Sayonara~

UPDATE: Ok, got tired of tweaking BlogSpot. This platform is NOT for photobloggers, so I'm moving to a better on: DeviantArt. See you guys there~

Reaction Paper: An Encounter with an Anthropologist

Dr. B, despite having an Phd. in anthropology, proved quite tactless in our first meeting. The first lesson discussed a range of topics from religion, to a recent suicide of a prominent general, and even to sex! Honestly, I am both impressed and entertained- having experienced teaching first hand, I know that getting your student's attention while sticking to the lesson plan can be quite a chore.

There are quite a few things that struck a nerve in the discussion. I am a devout catholic, despite being a computer scientist, and I have had many sleepless nights and heated discussions with my fellow professionals about the age-old debate concerning “Science vs. God”. On one hand, science, or as Dr. B have discussed, the scientific method, relies on proof. Even knowing something a priori, science still needs at least logic and reason. Faith, on the other hand, relies on belief without proof, about hope and the inherently unexplainable miracles.

In my opinion, Science is just a way of comprehending God's ways- an instrument from Him, through our scientists. Its a lot like the Bible in some ways, an instrument written by (divinely-inspired) humans, open to interpretation. A few examples: The Bible tells the story of genesis eg. “God created the world in six days, rested on the seventh”. When taking into consideration who wrote that story, even if he/she is divinely inspired, it would be impossible to measure time and translate it to something that we can comprehend. Maybe the writer simplified it, or maybe not- something to think about.

Another example: From year 2000 to 2005*, several scientific journals was published that confirms the existence of a single Creator. Of course, the scientists did not name who (God, Allah, etc.) but still- these journals have NOT been reverted yet. Several journals have tried to disprove these, the latest of which is Stephen Hawking's The Grand Design (2010). A good read, to be sure.

I find it distrubing when people generalize scientists to be godless heathens- people who rely on proof only. I'd like to believe, that I'm not the only Catholic Scientist/Skeptic here. Also, if I may offer a friendly advice from one (former) professor to another: Respect your student's beliefs. It would also be wise assume that there are catholics in a catholic college- not everyone would be devout, of course, but it would help to take care, none the less.

My two cents.

* related: Cosmic Microwave Background Theory

This whole post is my reaction paper for my first meeting with Dr. B, my current professor in "Theories in Research". This was written with only my stock knowledge (minimal to no references) and my opinions: read with a grain of salt.

The Flaws of College Education Today

Teens this days have smart phones- phones that are more powerful than most computers ten, even five years ago. These phones can access the internet very readily- in fact, most networks here in the Philippines offer a very cheap 50peso 1-day unlimited internet promo. Soon, affordable tablet PCs will reach the public, and a library of books will be available right next to a browser, all in our student's fingertips.

What does all these mean, in the context of our current college education system?

This means that memorizing theories are no longer needed. It will not matter if you don't know the answer, because the answer is only a few clicks away, right in your pocket. Seatworks, homeworks , quizzes and tests becomes obsolete, since these are the ways to test if a student remembers a lesson, which is unnecessary with the current technology. You forgot the next ingredient for the recipe? so what? LMGTFY. What's the difference between the star, bus and ring topologies? This. What's the truth table and the logic circuit for the function: P && (Q || R)? Easy.

The way the current system measures the abilities of the students is outdated (and in my opinion, no longer work).  And remember: What you can't measure, you can't control.. and if the colleges are not controlling what our students are learning, then what's the point? Imagine going to the university hoping to learn how to become a nurse, and after four years, everything you know are not only outdated, but even elementary grads can download a free app that knows most of what you do?

So what do we do? Stop going to school? NO.

Let me tell you guys a story. Two fresh CS graduates land a job in a company. They were given identical tasks- let's say, design and implement a module on a program. They both have zero experience programming in the industry, but has unlimited access to both the company's documentation as well as the internet. The problem is: there's only one permanent spot available, and the management have to decide which of the graduates to retain after their probationary period. If you are that manager, how will you pick? How do you decide, which one is better? Remember that they both have access to the same resources.

If I'm the manager, the graduate who have grasped the program quicker gets the job. Since everybody can become an effective employee (in the sense that the resources to learn how to do stuff are both accessible and free), then you have to become an efficient employee- spend less time learning and spend more time doing stuff. Now how can we do stuff faster? Let me ask you this: if you're learning to play basketball, how do you improve your game? The same is true on almost every discipline: You have to practice. You have to experience things, instead of memorizing them. An example: learning how to make the Fibonacci sequence appear on your computer is cute, but applying the Fibonacci sequence by creating a game will make you experience more (not to mention a lot more fun and challenging).

Bottom line: A parrot can memorize words, but will never understand its meaning. Don't be a parrot: Make new things, apply what you know NOW, and practice always.. and remember: Knowing is not enough. My two cents, Sayonara and have a great new year~